jurisdictional names for countries aren't qualia tho

im jus sayin we have defined boundaries on this idk why its ludicrous to think people would use them

This post was last modified: Sep 29, 2016 at 10:49 PM by kaZaam.

ur not even wrong (subjectively lmao) its just a silly thing to debate

im jus sayin we have defined boundaries on this idk why its ludicrous to think people would use them

it aint ludicrus its just lyk who cares

people who work with colours frequently :T

defined boundaries are fkin lame and beureaucratic

This post was last modified: Sep 29, 2016 at 10:53 PM by Yrrzy.

theyre useful for descriptive purposes

cause some people actually care to be specific yknow

people who work with colours frequently :T

thht was a rhetorical wuestion

but anyway yh back when i worked with colours frequently there was never any discrepancy whenever someone used the word pink to refer to this shade of colour

thats cool but idk how ideologically sound that is idk it seems pretty elitist, reminds me of grammar nazis hahah

people who work with colours frequently :T

i think just seeing colors is enough. you see it a certain way (like ebryone else) but theres no raisin to get upset when someone sees it another way. senses are kind of inherently indescribable

and anyway ponk is a spaiecific colour - the colour we're discussig

This post was last modified: Sep 29, 2016 at 10:56 PM by Yrrzy.

i feel like we're arguing about completely different things at this point and im just gonna keep using specific names when i need to be specific about things \o/

like i dont got a problem w/ you using broad terms i just want to use specific ones

o yeah it is a lot like grammar nazism huh. like who the fuck cares if i use a b instead of a v, you can still see what i mean

also lyk do people seriously think that we all live in the same world lmao obv colours r different to everyone coz we dont all live in the same dimensiom

i think this is a completely different argument at this point and one i dont rly have a stake in

i feel like we're arguing about completely different things at this point and im just gonna keep using specific names when i need to be specific about things \o/

like i dont got a problem w/ you using broad terms i just want to use specific ones

well, you kinda did have a problem but w.e,

thx for clearing that up

i feel like we're arguing about completely different things at this point and im just gonna keep using specific names when i need to be specific about things \o/

thats jreat. idt anyone was saying u shouldn't. just don't get mad when someone else doesn't

like i dont got a problem w/ you using broad terms

cept it kinda seems like you do

isnt there some sealife that have a color spectrum of like 20 different bases or something? its rly the most subjective, indescribable thing like ever

This post was last modified: Sep 29, 2016 at 11:01 PM by Yrrzy.

i dont have a problem w/ people using broad terms cause a lot of language we use today is used kinda incorrectly but it conveys the meaning just fine so it's not actually a problem

i have a problem w/ people trying to convince me the incorrect usage is like factually accurate

i was just mistaken in thinking we were talking about factual accuracy