This post was last modified: Jun 28, 2016 at 2:26 PM by kaZaam.

Could you post some code samples of formatting you'd like to achieve that is made impossible/difficult by this change?

there should

^^be a break here

Code:

there should

^^be a break here

Ahhh okay I see what you mean now. That's unintentional, it should only affect the line break immediately after the blockquote

This is a tricky one and I think I might have to use javascript to get it working the right way. The problem is that text immediately after a quote (i.e. not preceded by any linebreaks) isn't wrapped in a tag, so the first <br> tag that shows up after the quote (even if there's text in between) gets ignored.

But yeah I apologize, I thought it was only affecting the line break immediately after a quote

Ahhh okay I see what you mean now. That's unintentional, it should only affect the line break immediately after the blockquote

that's the entire thing i was complaining about in the first place

Ahhh okay I see what you mean now. That's unintentional, it should only affect the line break immediately after the blockquote

that's the entire thing i was complaining about in the first place

I just couldn't comprehend why anyone would want their quotes looking like this

lmao we were all confused why you didnt want people doing

this

Yeah I feel like a dick now, I had no idea it wasn't working properly lol

i understood your point (well at least i thought i did, i didn't realize you had missed the actual complaint) but i was confused as hell as to why you were defending getting rid of one inconvenience having introduced another lol

links aren't clickable

links aren't clickable

it's more of they aren't auto-parsed


see

they should be

agree

totally dumb that they aren't

This post was last modified: Jul 3, 2016 at 6:58 PM by rtsmarty.

maybe fixed

http://www.google.com test

test https://www.google.com test

test http://www.google.com

testhttp://www.google.com[/url]whatdoyouwantfromme

close enough

edit: ok maybe i fucked shit up never mind

need to make it so that url parsing happens later

making url parsing happen later doesn't help because the urls are still being parsed need to do this some other way so its rolled back for now

This post was last modified: Jul 3, 2016 at 9:19 PM by kaZaam.

im wondering why it isn't standard in all forum software

This post was last modified: Jul 9, 2016 at 4:02 PM by Elyk.

If you look at the Who's Online section of the main page there are some bots listed there. If you click on their avatars it brings you to here which defaults to your own account. At first I thought it might be the default behavior for a bad uid but it is not: https://minus.moe/member.php?action=profile&uid=9999

Times Quoted is (still?) broken. I view my profile and have 0 and I know I've been quoted at least twice.

This post was last modified: Jul 10, 2016 at 4:49 PM by Spritanium.

Times Quoted is (still?) broken. I view my profile and have 0 and I know I've been quoted at least twice.

It's not that it's broken, it just does literally nothing

tbh I put it there as a filler stat. I don't think there's any way to even determine the number of times someone has been quoted, unless we make a task that searches the content of every post (which is totally not worth it if you ask me)

EDIT: I guess there's the alert that sends whenever you get quoted, I could just count up every time that happens, although it wouldn't count quotes that already exist right now

EDIT: I guess there's the alert that sends whenever you get quoted, I could just count up every time that happens, although it wouldn't count quotes that already exist right now

Considering we're wiping the forum and statistics whenever we get out of the big dev stage I see no issue with this.

Yeah that would work fine.

This post was last modified: Feb 10, 2017 at 5:56 AM by Mario. Edit Reason: deleted

[deleted]