Poll: How should user information for reactions be handled?

Anonymous (Hide user information)
33.33%
3
Public (Show who gave each reaction)
11.11%
1
Optional (Setting in User CP to react anonymously, public by default)
55.56%
5
Total: 9 vote(s)
#21
kaZaam
like ebery new feature is socmedia esque wtf is that a prob now
#22
kaZaam
sorry i called you a damgus sprite i didn't mean it
#23
T-man
The reactions that are available are so inoffensive and cartoony I don't think it's worth starting beefs over.
#24
T-man
Like no one should need to own up to their wacky little blip they put on your post.
#25
kaZaam
oh shit lvl up i wanna upg my endurance
#26
kaZaam
hey i didnt bring up tha beef
#27
T-man
WHO REACTED WITH THE SCREAMING GUY ON MY POST

I WANNA KNOW RIGHT NOW

STEP UP AND TALK TO ME LIKE A MAN BRAH

FUCK'N DO IT
#28
kaZaam
i dont think we should take responsibility for beef purposes, i think we should take responsibility for unanonymous msg board purposes. like why not outside of you get the idea
#29
kaZaam
that actually wasn't me lmao i shouldve though
#30
kaZaam
ehhhhh it'll prob grow on me if it's what eberyone else wants. i think im just pissed fab is broken
#31
kaZaam
good sh*ts should def be public though. a little bit of the gratification it should have is missing imo
#32
Yoshin
Alas it was me, Yoshin!
#33
kaZaam
we need a damn str8 button.
#34
T-man
(May 23, 2016 at 12:53 AM)McPhresh Wrote: good sh*ts should def be public though. a little bit of the gratification it should have is missing imo

I definitely agree with this. Good sh*ts should mean something.
#35
Spritanium
Yeah making Good Sh*ts public would probably be a good idea, since you're just telling someone you liked their post

I was joking about the beef thing, I don't think anyone will actually have the capacity to be offended by these smilies

When we were discussing this last month, I liked the point @rtsmarty made: just because we have information doesn't mean we need to make it available.
[Image: supercorrect.png]
#36
Draku
on a users profile theres just a whole list of good sh*ts they've gotten with the image repeated every single time for each post and contributor
[Image: s2n7oi.png]
#37
kaZaam
js anonymizing shit inherently makes input less meaningful esp in a community this small. w/e though facepunch style is ok i just dont prefer it
#38
T-man
(May 23, 2016 at 3:51 AM)McPhresh Wrote: js anonymizing shit inherently makes input less meaningful esp in a community this small. w/e though facepunch style is ok i just dont prefer it

I was back and forth of the issue of anonymous reactions, but I really grew to like having it be a mystery.
I think it better fits the atmosphere we're trying to set with the forum.

[Image: XyvMzv2.png]

6 of you knuckleheads reacted with a 'nutted but she still suckin' face and I don't know who, I can make some educated guesses but I think it's kind of fun that I'll never know for sure.
#39
kaZaam
yeah ok it's fine
#40
rtsmarty
(May 23, 2016 at 3:51 AM)McPhresh Wrote: js anonymizing shit inherently makes input less meaningful esp in a community this small
couldn't disagree more. anonymising makes the input more honest and more meaningful.

Users browsing this thread:

Forum Jump:

";